Following AI in China and the United States. Grounded in evidence, open to debate.
An encrypted file of roughly 313 MB brought ZCode's background snapshots into question. After reading the public material, what concerns me most is this: do the permissions we give AI have any real, enforceable limits?
Read the essay
Reports that Nvidia and other firms have restricted certain Fable uses put data control at the center of enterprise AI. Technical strength cannot override information security, and the lessons of growth at all costs matter even more in the AI era.
Read the essay
Anthropic’s misuse report raises questions about how much an AI company may know and disclose, and who holds it accountable. Privacy and the right to benefit from scientific progress should not depend on nationality or political alignment.
Read the essay
Qwen and Kimi's openness, chip export restrictions, and the longer view of energy and talent. AI needs greater transparency and scrutiny—and competition needs a purpose beyond exhausting the other side.
Read the essay
The latest X announcements, immediate versus banked resets, and a restarted weekly clock: what users gain and what the cost to OpenAI depends on.
Read the essay
Fear for humanity, suspicion of corporate motives. A closer reading of the evidence and incentives behind the AI brakes debate.
Read the essayNo prescribed answers, and no false equivalence. Space for evidence-based disagreement and writing worth your time.