IT之家 AI

Nvidia's 9-Year-Old Tesla V100 Veteran Fights Again: 4-GPU Cluster Beats 2 DGX Sparks in AI Inference

IT Home, October 13 news: The YouTube channel Jun Yamog yesterday (October 12) released a video testing 4 Tesla V100 cards mounted on an NVLink carrier board. In the Qwen3.8-Flash-Next benchmark, long-prompt processing…

Four NVIDIA graphics cards are installed in a computer setup with visible branding and heatsinks.
Image source · IT之家 AI

IT Home October 13 news: The YouTube channel Jun Yamog yesterday (October 12) released a video testing 4 Tesla V100 cards mounted on an NVLink carrier board. In the Qwen3.8-Flash-Next benchmark,long-prompt processing was 230% faster than the M5 Ultra and 40% faster than 2 DGX Spark units.

According to IT Home's check of public information, the Tesla V100 is a data center GPU launched by Nvidia in 2017, based on the Volta architecture, commonly used for AI training and inference. Its 32GB version comes with HBM2 memory, and its 900GB/s memory bandwidth can support fast reading of large model parameters and data.

NVLink is Nvidia's high-speed GPU interconnect technology, used to transfer data directly between multiple GPUs. Compared with communication over PCIe, NVLink can reduce interconnect bottlenecks and is commonly used in multi-GPU servers and AI computing clusters.

Four NVIDIA graphics cards are installed in a computer setup with visible branding and heatsinks.

This NVLink carrier board provides 300GB/s bandwidth and is equipped with 6 NVLink 2.0 connections. To accommodate 4 individual GPUs, the tester modified NVIDIA A100 coolers so they could dissipate about 300W of heat per V100, and connected the board via a PCIe x8 interface.

The streamer tested with a 4-bit quantized Qwen3.8-Flash-Next model, comparing against 2 DGX Spark units with 128GB LPDDR5X unified memory and a Mac Studio device equipped with the M5 Ultra chip.

A comparison chart titled 'Qwen 3.8 Flash Next' shows that the 4x V100 configuration outperforms the 2x GB10 in both 'Prompt Processing' with 4098.3 tok/s and 'Token Generation' with 155.2 tok/s.

In the long-prompt processing test, the 4 V100s were 40% faster than the DGX Spark cluster and 230% faster than the M5 Ultra. The tester noted that the huge gap with Apple Silicon may be partly due to insufficient software optimization.

A bar chart titled 'PP - Prompt Processing' shows the 8x RTX Pro 6000 achieving the highest score of 9,230 TOK/S with 'Long Prompt', significantly outperforming other configurations.

In the short-prompt processing test, the V100 cluster maintained a 40% speed advantage over the DGX Spark and was 163% faster than the M5 Ultra. The results show that older data center GPUs still have high throughput in certain inference workloads.

A bar chart titled 'PP · PROMPT PROCESSING' shows '8× RTX Pro 6000 · Alex' leading with a score of 12,677, outperforming other configurations like '4× V100' and '2× GB10'.

In the short-prompt token generation test, the 4 V100s reached 100.6 tok/s, 121% faster than 2 DGX Sparks; the M5 Ultra scored 44.5 tok/s.

A bar chart titled 'TG · Token Generation' shows '8× RTX Pro 6000 · Alex' achieving the highest score of 126 TOK/s for short prompts.

Original source

IT之家 AI

Content notes

Original publication and rights belong to the source.

Machine translation · Refer to the original